Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 53.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Ling 3.1 Flash | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.075 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.23 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.11 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
Ling 3.1 Flash is 53.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.1 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 Max Prime vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Haiku 5.5