Gemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.075 / $0.23
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.075
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.23
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.015
Context window1M1M
Max output944K262K
Intelligence index50.4—
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-132026-10-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.

More comparisons