GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.23 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 54.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 9 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Sol ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Sol vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Sol vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5