Command A+ vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
| Command A+ | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.23 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 192K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 6.2 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Ling 3.1 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A+ vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A+ vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A+ vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A+ vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A+ vs Mistral Large 4Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5