MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.075 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen (Alibaba)
$4.00 / $12.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 45.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price / 1M$0.075$4.00
Output price / 1M$0.30$12.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.13$6.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0075$0.50
Context window1M1M
Max output524K131K
Intelligence index28.9—
Coding index——
Providers141
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-09-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 45.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $300.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.

More comparisons