Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.075 / $0.23
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Sonnet 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.075
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.23
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.015
Context window1M1M
Max output128K262K
Intelligence index54.2—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-282026-10-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.

More comparisons