Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.075 / $0.23
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 26.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.075
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.23
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M—$0.015
Context window66K1M
Max output59K262K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-10-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 26.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.

More comparisons