Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.075 / $0.23
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
NVIDIA
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Ling 3.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.075$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.23$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.02
Context window1M1M
Max output262K236K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers—9
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-022026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons