GPT-6.1 Terra vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 17.8× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.23 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 51 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Ling 3.1 Flash is 17.8× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Command A+GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1