GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

OpenAI

GPT-6 Luna Pro

OpenAI
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.075 / $0.23
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
OpenAI
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 44% cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.23
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.015
Context window1.1M1M
Max output128K262K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-10-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna Pro or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 44% cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna Pro ≈ $450.00, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.

More comparisons