DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.15 / $0.60

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.1 Flash

inclusionAI

$0.075 / $0.23

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Ling 3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.15	$0.075
Output price / 1M	$0.60	$0.23
Blended price (3:1)	$0.26	$0.11
Cached input / 1M	$0.003	$0.015
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	393K	262K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	42	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-10-02
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.

More comparisons