Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.23 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 46 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 2 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Ling 3.1 Flash is 35.6× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.
More comparisons
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Command A+Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1