Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 20.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$0.10$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.30$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$3.00
Cached input / 1M—$0.25
Context window1.3M1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index8.271.9
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Llama 4 Scout is 20.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons