Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 25% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M1.3M
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index36.2—
Coding index—8.2
Providers104
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%0.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 25% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons