Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 11% cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$1.50$2.00
Output price / 1M$9.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$3.00
Cached input / 1M—$0.25
Context window131K1M
Max output66K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—71.9
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-042026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 11% cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons