GPT-6.1 Terra vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 13.3× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1.1M).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 51 | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | 4 | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 13.3× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Command A+GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs Nano Banana 2.1