Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 5.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$8.00$2.00
Output price / 1M$40.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—71.9
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 5.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons