GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$0.37$2.00
Output price / 1M$1.25$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—71.9
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-022026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons