Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 25% cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$2.00$2.00
Output price / 1M$10.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index—71.9
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 25% cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons