DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.15 / $0.60

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama

$0.10 / $0.30

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 43% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M	$0.15	$0.10
Output price / 1M	$0.60	$0.30
Blended price (3:1)	$0.26	$0.15
Cached input / 1M	$0.003	—
Context window	1M	1.3M
Max output	393K	16K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	8.2
Providers	42	4
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2025-04-05
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 43% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons