Hy4 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy4 is 4.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Hy4 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | 71.9 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Hy4 is 4.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro