Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
NVIDIA
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 37% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Llama 4 ScoutNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.24
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window1.3M1M
Max output16K236K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index8.2—
Providers49
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Llama 4 Scout is 37% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons