Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 20.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.10
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.15
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K1.3M
Max output59K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—8.2
Providers14
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 20.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons