GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than Ling 3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0227 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0625 | $0.23 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0326 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0207 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 41 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-10-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.1 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than Ling 3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $76.65, Ling 3.1 Flash ≈ $262.50.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5