DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0149 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.0149
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.0498
Cached input / 1M$0.003$0.0149
Context window1M1M
Max output393K131K
Intelligence index—27.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers4240
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $106.95.

More comparisons