GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0149 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
NVIDIA
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 13.6).
GLM 5.3 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.0149$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.15$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.0498$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.0149$0.02
Context window1M1M
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index27.813.6
Coding index71.5—
Providers409
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $106.95, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons