GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen (Alibaba)
$4.00 / $12.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price / 1M$0.15$4.00
Output price / 1M$0.50$12.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$6.00
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.50
Context window1.3M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index41.8
Coding index71.5
Providers311
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-09-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.

More comparisons