Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0163 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.1× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.2 vs 27.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.0163
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.0492
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.0163
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index36.227.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers1040
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.1× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $106.55.

More comparisons