Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0149 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 80.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (54.2 vs 27.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.0149
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.0498
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.0149
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index54.227.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers1040
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-282026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 80.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ≈ $9,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $106.95.

More comparisons