MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto 26.9

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.9

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
U
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.4× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashPareto 26.9
Input price / 1M$0.14$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.28$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.25
Context window1.1M262K
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index26.7—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-10-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Pareto 26.9?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.4× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+Pareto 26.9 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.9 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.9 vs Kimi K3.1 ProPareto 26.9 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.9 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.9 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.9 vs Gemini 4 ArgonPareto 26.9 vs Claude Haiku 5.5