Gemini 4 Argon vs Pareto 26.9
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Pareto 26.9 is 6% cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Gemini 4 Argon | Pareto 26.9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $3.75 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 50.4 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 6 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Pareto 26.9?
Pareto 26.9 is 6% cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini 4 Argon vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.
More comparisons
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 TerraGemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 4 Argon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemini 4 Argon vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemini 4 Argon vs Mistral Large 4Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 Argon vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 4 Argon vs Command A+Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto 26.9 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.9 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.9 vs Kimi K3.1 ProPareto 26.9 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.9 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.9 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.9 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Pareto 26.9 vs Nano Banana 2.1