Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic

$0.10 / $0.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.2 vs 26.7). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	Claude Haiku 5.5	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.10	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$0.50	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$0.20	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	$0.01	$0.0028
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	128K	131K
Intelligence index	36.2	26.7
Coding index	—	—
Providers	10	10
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-07	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons