MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.9

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.9

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
U
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.9
Input price / 1M$0.15$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.60$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.25
Context window1M262K
Max output524K131K
Intelligence index28.9—
Coding index——
Providers14—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-10-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Pareto 26.9?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons