DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.15 / $0.60

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 33% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.15	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$0.60	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$0.26	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	$0.003	$0.0028
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	393K	131K
Intelligence index	—	26.7
Coding index	—	—
Providers	42	10
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 33% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons