Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.9

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
U
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 15.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.9
Input price / 1M$0.15$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.50$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.25
Context window1M262K
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-10-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Pareto 26.9?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 15.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons