MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen (Alibaba)
$4.00 / $12.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price / 1M$0.14$4.00
Output price / 1M$0.28$12.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$6.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.50
Context window1.1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index26.7—
Coding index——
Providers81
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.

More comparisons