MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA

$0.15 / $0.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 26% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26.7 vs 13.6). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.15
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$0.50
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.24
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.02
Context window	1.1M	1M
Max output	131K	236K
Intelligence index	26.7	13.6
Coding index	—	—
Providers	10	9
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-10-15
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 26% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons