DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Pareto 26.9

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.15 / $0.60

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Pareto 26.9

Unbiased

$2.50 / $7.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Pareto 26.9
Input price / 1M	$0.15	$2.50
Output price / 1M	$0.60	$7.50
Blended price (3:1)	$0.26	$3.75
Cached input / 1M	$0.003	$0.25
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	393K	131K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	42	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-10-13
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Pareto 26.9?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons