Llama 4 Scout vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
P

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
P
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 17% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
Llama 4 ScoutTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.18
Cached input / 1M
Context window1.3M262K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Llama 4 Scout is 17% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons