Claude Fable 5.2 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Prism Ml
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 88.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.075
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.0375
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-09-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 88.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons