Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Prism Ml
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 18.6× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.075
Output price / 1M$9.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.18
Cached input / 1M—$0.0375
Context window131K262K
Max output66K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-042026-09-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 18.6× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons