Gemini 4 Carbon vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Prism Ml
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 22.1× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 4 CarbonTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.075
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.0375
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102026-09-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 22.1× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons