Hy4 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 3.5× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.075 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.0375 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 3.5× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Gemini 4 CarbonTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Claude Fable 5.2Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 TerraTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro