Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 8.1× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 128K).
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.30$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$1.21
Cached input / 1M——
Context window1.3M128K
Max output16K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index8.222.1
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama 4 Scout is 8.1× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons