Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 13.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.45
Output price / 1M$40.00$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.21
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M128K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—22.1
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 13.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons