Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 2.8× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.45
Output price / 1M$9.00$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$1.21
Cached input / 1M——
Context window131K128K
Max output66K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—22.1
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-042025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 2.8× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons