Hy4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy4 is 48% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| Hy4 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.45 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $3.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $1.21 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | 22.1 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2025-07-25 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Hy4 is 48% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro