GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 60.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 71.9 |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 60.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Hy4Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro