Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 323.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 27.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.0399
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.0784
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.0495
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.627.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers542
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 323.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.

More comparisons