GLM 5.3 Flash vs Pareto 26.10
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 100.4× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Pareto 26.10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.013 | $0.80 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0168 | $3.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.014 | $1.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0119 | $0.03 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 40 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Pareto 26.10?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 100.4× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $34.40, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+Pareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.10 vs Kimi K3.1 ProPareto 26.10 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.10 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.10 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.10 vs Gemini 4 ArgonPareto 26.10 vs Claude Haiku 5.5